Erik De Bom, Ph.D. in Classics (2009), Catholic University of Leuven, has published on intellectual history, the history of political thought and Neo-Latin literature. Focus laid on political writings, their different genres and translations, and various authors such as Justus Lipsius, Carolus Scribani, Nicolaus Vernulaeus and Johannes a Chokier.
Marijke Janssens, Ph.D. in Classics (2009), Catholic University of Leuven, prepared a critical edition with English translation of Lipsius's Monita et exempla politica. She published on classical and Neo-Latin literature, ancient, medieval and Early Modern philosophy (especially Stoicism), rhetoric and intellectual history.
Toon Van Houdt, Ph.D in Classics (1999), teaches Latin and reception studies in the Department of Literature of the Catholic University of Leuven. His research focuses on late scholastic and humanist moral and political thought, as well as on Jesuit emblem literature.
Jan Papy, Ph.D. in Classics (1992) and MA in Philosophy (1996), is Research Professor of Neo-Latin at the Catholic University of Leuven. He has published on Italian humanism, Humanism in the Low Countries, Intellectual History and Renaissance Philosophy in the Low Countries.
Scholars interested in Early Modern European political thought, the history of ideas, the history of philosophy, intellectual history, the classical tradition and Neo-Latin literature.
"The editors conclude their introduction with the observation that ‘‘it is not—nor has been—our ambition to offer a single scholarly exemplum unreservedly and unfalteringly to be imitated by others,’’ but that they would nevertheless ‘‘feel honored and satisfied if the various contributions . . . proved to contain useful insights and offer fresh approaches which inspire other scholars to explore in more detail the intriguing dynamics of political writing of the early modern period, in general, and one of its most brilliant representatives, the Louvain humanist Justus Lipsius, more particularly’’ (22). Quite so." Martine Julia van Ittersum, Renaissance Quarterly 64 (2011), no. 4, pp. 1205-1207.
Table of contents
About the Editors
About the Contributors
Introduction: Towards a More Balanced View of Justus Lipsius’s Political Writings and Their Influence, Erik De Bom, Marijke Janssens, Toon Van Houdt and Jan Papy
PART I: GENERAL TENDENCIES
Exempla, Prudence and Casuistry in Renaissance Political Discourse, Mikael Hörnqvist
History and Exemplarity in the Work of Lipsius, Harro Höpfl
Stoicism in Political Humanism and Natural Law, Bo Lindberg
PART II: RHETORIC, HISTORY AND EXEMPLARITY
Monita et exempla politica as Example of a Genre, Ann Moss
Rhetoric and Exemplarity in Justus Lipsius’ Monita et exempla politicav, Marijke Janssens
Justus Lipsius and the Challenges of Historical Exemplarity, Harald E. Braun
Justus Lipsius and the Cento Form, George Hugo Tucker
PART III: VIRTUES AND POLITICS
Stoic Fate and Christian Rule: Superstition, Fate and Divination in Lipsius’s Monita et exempla politica (1605), Jan Papy
The Clementia Lipsiana: Political Analysis, Autobiography and Panegyric, Violet Soen
Prudence in Lipsius’s Monita et exempla politica: Stoic Virtue, Aristotelian Virtue or not a Virtue at All?, Diana Stanciu
Secret compensation: A Friendly and Lawful Alternative to Lipsius’s Political Thought, Wim Decock
PART IV: LIPSIUS’S HERITAGE
Carolus Scribani and the Lipsian Legacy. The Politico-Christianus and Lipsius’s Image of the Good Prince, Erik De Bom
A Lipsian Legacy? Neo-Absolutism, Natural Law and the Decline of Reason of State in France 1660-1760, Jacob Soll