IRS Simplifies
Required Minimum Distributions
by Frank Armstrong
President, Investor Solutions, Inc.
www.InvestorSolutions.com
In
a sweeping simplification, the IRS has published new Proposed
Regulations covering Required Minimum Distributions (RMD) from pension
plans and IRA’s. Required Minimum Distributions affect pension and
IRA account owners that have reached their Required Beginning Date (RBD)
at age 70 ½.
Beneficiary selection at the Required Beginning
Date is no longer irrevocable. You can now change beneficiaries as
often as your changing life situation requires.
To make life even simpler,
your required minimum distribution (RMD) calculation will not be
affected by selection of beneficiary, or if the beneficiary changes.
All RMD calculations during the life of the account holder will be
based on the account owner’s age less ten years as published in IRS
tables. There is one exception: if your spouse is the beneficiary AND
he/she is more than 10 years younger than the account owner. In that
case, the couple can use a joint life expectancy table that captures
the spouse’s younger age and results in a lower required
distribution.
It’s still important to
carefully select your beneficiary, and contingent beneficiary. A
failure to name a beneficiary will still lead to undesirable tax
consequences. Failure to name the right beneficiary might still
destroy the very best of estate and distribution plans.
In the vast majority of cases,
the new calculation method will result in smaller required
distributions, and longer deferral periods for account owners. Both of
these are very good things indeed for the taxpayer.
The new regs clean up a messy
problem. It will no longer be necessary to choose whether or not to
re-calculate one or both lives. This greatly simplifies annual
reckoning during life. But more importantly, it eases the penalty at
death if a spouse whose life was being re-calculated dies and
therefore has his/her life expectancy go to zero. Reducing the life
expectancy of the deceased accelerates the required distributions for
the remaining party.
Natural (that is real people
as opposed to corporations and trusts) beneficiaries will in all cases
be able to utilize their own remaining life expectancy to calculate
distributions from inherited IRA’s. This will allow them to
“stretch” out payments over far longer time frames than might have
happened with some re-calculation methods. Again, this is a great
thing for taxpayers.
Getting rid of the entire
re-calculation issue resolves much of the uncertainty in estate
planning for pension assets. Because the taxpayer had little control
over the order of death of the spouses, the results were
unpredictable. The consequences could often be disastrous if the
“wrong” party died first and the size of the account was a
significant portion of the couple’s net worth.
The new regs retain many
favorable features of the old ones. Two that are especially noteworthy
are:
- Spouses
will still have the right to convert an inherited IRA into their
own IRA as under the old regs.
- Qualifying
trusts will still be able to defer distributions from IRA’s if
they conform to the included published requirements that allow the
IRS to “look through” the trust to determine the natural
beneficiary.
Why is the IRS being so
generous? Well, it’s not just that they are kinder and gentler. The
old regs hadn’t established any reliable reporting requirements, so
compliance suffered. The new regs require financial institutions to
report account balances and distributions to the IRS so that required
payments are much more likely to be made on time, and penalties
extracted if they are not made on time. These are good things if your
job is collecting taxes.
The new regulations are
retroactive to January 1, 2001. While the regulations are
“proposed” the IRS has indicated that taxpayers may rely on them
beginning at once. After all, we operated under the old “proposed”
regulations since 1986!
All in all, the new
regulations simplify planning and reduce some of the uncertainty that
the old regulations introduced. But, careful planning is still
necessary to maximize the benefits of these important assets to
yourself and your family.
Frank Armstrong, CFP, is the author of Investment
Strategies for the 21st Century, published here,
President of Investor
Solutions, Inc., a fee-only Registered Investment Advisor,
and Chief Investment Strategist of DirectAdvice.com.
Note: The
featured writer is solely responsible for the content of this article.
The opinions expressed herein are not necessarily those of MFI or BES,
Inc.
Get The Facts:
For detailed fund information, risk, rankings, and performance, click here.
|