Fill 'er up! Roth or
Regular?
by Frank Armstrong
President, Investor Solutions, Inc.
www.InvestorSolutions.com
If
you are qualified for either a Roth or Regular IRA, which should you
choose? Unfortunately, no one can give you an absolute answer, but
here are some of the considerations:
First, always remember that our government could
change the tax laws at any time. A change to a flat tax, for instance,
would probably be a disaster for Roth economics. What Uncle gives, he
can take at any time.
Having said that, if tax advantage is a driving
factor for you, here are some tax guidelines:
- If
you expect to be in a lower bracket after you retire than when you
make the contribution, go for a regular IRA.
- If
your tax bracket will be higher during withdrawal, a Roth IRA will
end up with a higher value for you.
- If
your tax bracket will be the same, there won’t be a penny’s
worth of difference to you.
- So,
as your income changes you may make different choices.
If you are in a very low tax bracket, the value
of a “lost” or “wasted” deduction if small, so a Roth is a
no-brainer.
In most cases, Roth IRA’s offer more
flexibility than Regular.
- There
are no forced distributions at age 70 ˝. The lack of forced
distributions should be very helpful to anyone fearing that their
retirement accounts might be substantially depleted as they aged.
- You
can continue to make contributions after 70 ˝.
- Roth
is a possible source for education or other large future expenses
because you can always withdraw your contributions without penalty
or tax. For instance, if you were to make a $2000 deposit each
year after your child was born, you could withdraw $36,000 (or
$72,000 for a couple depositing $4000 a year) without penalty or
tax when the child reached 18. The remaining accumulation can
continue to grow until you retire after age 59 ˝. So, your funds
are not tied up as they would be in a Regular IRA.
- Roth
really shines as an estate planning tool. Especially if you think
you may not need to spend the money during your lifetime, the
ability to prepay income taxes for your next generation makes it
worth far more than a traditional IRA. Unlike the traditional, the
Roth can be conveniently used to satisfy the Uniform Credit
amount. There is no wasted credit amount due to income tax.
You will notice I haven’t mentioned
non-deductible IRA’s. That’s because I don’t think they are such
a great idea. Here’s why:
- There
is no current tax deduction.
- Investments
inside the non-deductible IRA will receive ordinary income tax
upon distribution. So, you are giving up the opportunity to pay
capital gains rates on your accumulations.
- If
you really need your money before age 59 ˝, you may be subject to
the 10% early withdrawal penalty.
- You
will be forced to make distributions at age 70 ˝.
- Gains
will be subject to income tax in your estate.
- Accounting
for basis on withdrawal is an aggravating tax problem because all
withdrawals must be apportioned between deductible and
non-deductible accounts. Not fun.
So, to avoid the problems of non-deductible
IRA’s, in most cases I think investors would be better off in a
total market index fund.
If you are qualified for a Roth or regular IRA,
by all means take advantage of it. Remember, a tax advantage is a
terrible thing to waste!
Frank Armstrong, CFP, is the author of Investment
Strategies for the 21st Century, published here,
President of Investor
Solutions, Inc., a fee-only Registered Investment Advisor,
and Chief Investment Strategist of DirectAdvice.com.
Note: The
featured writer is solely responsible for the content of this article.
The opinions expressed herein are not necessarily those of MFI or BES,
Inc.
Get The Facts:
For detailed fund information, risk, rankings, and performance, click here.
|