Death and Immortality in Late Neoplatonism
Studies on the Ancient Commentaries on Plato's Phaedo
Biographical note
Sebastian R. P. Gertz, Ph.D. (2010) in Classics, University of Cambridge, is a Research Associate to the Ancient Commentators on Aristotle project at King's College London. He has published on Greek Neoplatonism and the ancient commentary tradition.
Readership
All those interested in Plato, the Neoplatonic tradition (particularly Proclus, Olympiodorus and Damascius), ancient commentaries, the intellectual history of Late Antiquity, and ancient psychology and ethics.
Reviews
"This is an excellent book which makes a great contribution not only to the literature on the commentary tradition of the Phaedo, but also to the study of Neoplatonic commentaries and the way in which such commentaries should be read. Sarah Klitenic Wear in BMCR, 8.5.2012
Table of contents
Introduction
1. Nature and purpose of the present study
2. Olympiodorus and Damascius: two philosophical personalities
2.1. Olympiodorus
2.2. Damascius
3. Interpreting the Phaedo: the centrality of the skopo¢j
3.1. Finding the skopo¢j
3.2. Applying the skopo¢j
Chapter One
Olympiodorus on suicide
1. Philosophy as mele¢th qana¢tou and the prohibition of suicide
2. Two kinds of death and separation
3. Two ways of arguing against suicide
4. Olympiodorus’ three arguments
5. The esoteric doctrine
6. The philosophical argument
7. The case for suicide
8. Olympiodorus’ conclusion
Chapter Two
Politics and purification in Socrates’ second defence (Phd. 63b-69e)
1. Introduction
1.1. The civic virtues and the statesman
1.2. Old puzzles
2. The civic context(s) of Plato’s Phaedo
3. The discourses on purification
4. The virtues
5. Conclusion: The rapture of virtues
Chapter Three
Syrianus and Damascius: two interpretations of the argument from opposites in Plato’s
Phaedo (Phd. 69e-72d)
1. Introduction 00
2. The background to Syrianus and Damascius
3. Syrianus
3.1. Syrianus’ interpretation of the argument from opposites in outline
3.2. Syrianus’ approach to particular problems with the argument
3.3. How much does the argument from opposites prove?
4. Damascius: s%¢zetai o¥ lo¢goj?
4.1. Damascius’ critique of Syrianus
4.2. Damascius’ own version of the argument
5. Conclusion
Chapter Four
Memory, forgetfulness and recollection in the Phaedo Commentaries
1. Introduction
2. What does the argument prove?
3. What is recollection, and how does it work?
4. What forms are recollected, and why do we need forms at all?
5. Two puzzles about memory and recollection
Chapter Five
The affinity argument in Plato’s Phaedo
1. Introduction
2. Alcinous, Plotinus and Porphyry
3. Iamblichus
4. Proclus’ analysis of the argument
5. Damascius’ critique of Proclus
6. Three objections to the argument
7. Two Platonic problems
Chapter Six
The final argument in Plato’s Phaedo
1. The ‘second voyage’
2. The final argument
3. Strato’s criticisms and their impact
4. Refuting Strato 000
5. Damascius’ new analysis
6. Concluding evaluation
7. A final note on the argument for immortality in Proclus’
Elements of Theology
Chapter Seven
Immortality and afterlife in the Phaedo myth
1. Preliminaries
2. The afterlife journey: Phd. 107c-108c
3. Which earth is the ‘true earth’?
4. The underground rivers in Damascius and Olympiodorus
5. Epilogue
General conclusions
Bibliography
1. Nature and purpose of the present study
2. Olympiodorus and Damascius: two philosophical personalities
2.1. Olympiodorus
2.2. Damascius
3. Interpreting the Phaedo: the centrality of the skopo¢j
3.1. Finding the skopo¢j
3.2. Applying the skopo¢j
Chapter One
Olympiodorus on suicide
1. Philosophy as mele¢th qana¢tou and the prohibition of suicide
2. Two kinds of death and separation
3. Two ways of arguing against suicide
4. Olympiodorus’ three arguments
5. The esoteric doctrine
6. The philosophical argument
7. The case for suicide
8. Olympiodorus’ conclusion
Chapter Two
Politics and purification in Socrates’ second defence (Phd. 63b-69e)
1. Introduction
1.1. The civic virtues and the statesman
1.2. Old puzzles
2. The civic context(s) of Plato’s Phaedo
3. The discourses on purification
4. The virtues
5. Conclusion: The rapture of virtues
Chapter Three
Syrianus and Damascius: two interpretations of the argument from opposites in Plato’s
Phaedo (Phd. 69e-72d)
1. Introduction 00
2. The background to Syrianus and Damascius
3. Syrianus
3.1. Syrianus’ interpretation of the argument from opposites in outline
3.2. Syrianus’ approach to particular problems with the argument
3.3. How much does the argument from opposites prove?
4. Damascius: s%¢zetai o¥ lo¢goj?
4.1. Damascius’ critique of Syrianus
4.2. Damascius’ own version of the argument
5. Conclusion
Chapter Four
Memory, forgetfulness and recollection in the Phaedo Commentaries
1. Introduction
2. What does the argument prove?
3. What is recollection, and how does it work?
4. What forms are recollected, and why do we need forms at all?
5. Two puzzles about memory and recollection
Chapter Five
The affinity argument in Plato’s Phaedo
1. Introduction
2. Alcinous, Plotinus and Porphyry
3. Iamblichus
4. Proclus’ analysis of the argument
5. Damascius’ critique of Proclus
6. Three objections to the argument
7. Two Platonic problems
Chapter Six
The final argument in Plato’s Phaedo
1. The ‘second voyage’
2. The final argument
3. Strato’s criticisms and their impact
4. Refuting Strato 000
5. Damascius’ new analysis
6. Concluding evaluation
7. A final note on the argument for immortality in Proclus’
Elements of Theology
Chapter Seven
Immortality and afterlife in the Phaedo myth
1. Preliminaries
2. The afterlife journey: Phd. 107c-108c
3. Which earth is the ‘true earth’?
4. The underground rivers in Damascius and Olympiodorus
5. Epilogue
General conclusions
Bibliography
€199.00$277.00
John J. Cleary (1949–2009) was an internationally recognised authority in ancient Greek philosophy. This volume of penetrating studies of Plato, Aristotle, and Proclus, philosophy of mathematics, and ancient theories of education, display Cleary’s range of expertise and originality of approach.
€107.00$149.00
Either as insider or as sensitive observer, Plutarch provides us with exceptional evidence to reconstruct the spiritual and intellectual atmosphere of the first centuries CE. This collection of articles sheds important light on the religious and philosophical discourse of Late Antiquity.
€101.00$140.00
Drawing on recent scholarship and delving systematically into Iamblichean texts, these ten papers establish Iamblichus as the great innovator of Neoplatonic philosophy who broadened its appeal for future generations of philosophers.
€111.00$144.00
This books delves into the major tenets of Syrianus' philosophical teachings on the Timaeus and Parmenides based on the testimonia of Proclus, as found in Proclus' commentaries on Plato's Timaeus and Parmenides, and Damascius, as reported in his On First Principles and commentary on Plato's ...
€110.00$142.00
This volume of essays presents a selection of studies in the ways in which Platonist psychology is adapted to the needs of thinkers in the three great religious traditions of later antiquity, Judaism, Christianity and Islam. The authors are all acknowledged experts in their own fields, as well ...
€104.00$135.00
The Commentary of al-Nayrizi (circa 920) on Euclid’s Elements occupies an important place in the history of mathematics and of philosophy. The present work presents an annotated English translation of Books II-IV and of a hitherto lost portion of Book I.
€140.00$181.00
This book integrates interdsciplinary work with philosophical analyses to explain facets of the perennial question of time's nature and existence, both in its contemporary and its original classical contexts, and it explains the two most influential investigations of the topic in classical ...
€110.00$142.00
This book offers a study of the medieval Georgian translation of Proklos' Elementatio Theologica. It establishes ist significance for the Greek text and provides first insights into the textual and philosophical significance of Georgian translations and commentaries of Greek texts.
€121.00$157.00
This book examines Proclus' doctrine of evil in light of the tradition of exegesis of Plato's treatment of evil within the schools of ancient Platonism, from Middle Platonism to early Neoplatonism.
- 1 of 2
- ››
No additional information